Search for: "Ac v. Cb"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2019, 9:17 am
The text of these tariffs is based, respectively, on the 2012 AUCC Model Licence (Exhibit AC-2V), and the University Three-Year Premium Licence (Exhibit AC-23N), which are attached. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
http://accesscopyright.ca/media/bulletins/impacts-of-the-education-sector%E2%80%99s-interpretation-of-fair-dealing/Access Copyright (“AC”) is finally getting what it wishes for, which is a consolidated hearing at the Copyright Board on its post-secondary tariffs for 2011-2013 and 2014-2017.Here is a recent Notice from July 3, 2015 from the Copyright Board regarding Access Copyright (“AC”):From: <Gilles.McDougall@cb-cda.gc.ca>Date: Fri,… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:05 am
Indeed, it agreed to renew the standard pre CCH v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:58 am
Walter Cronkite clip on Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 1:06 pm
This ought to be interesting because, in addition to certain other potential serious problems, AC lacks digital rights from a lot of creators and publishers who have been understandably reluctant to involve third parties such as Access Copyright.Here’s a good piece on AC’s problems in terms of future legislation and its attempted incursion into digital rights by Gary Rodrigues, a former Co-Chair of AC when it was known as CanCopy.AC also wants to push back on… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:02 pm
The text of these tariffs is based, respectively, on the 2012 AUCC Model Licence (Exhibit AC‐2V), and the University Three‐Year Premium Licence (Exhibit AC‐23N). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:43 pm
For example, in the K-12 matter, CMEC eventually admitted to the Copyright Board that the fundamentally important survey evidence that had been gathered using a methodology it had agreed to several months after the CCH v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
AC dismissed the CBC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:47 am
cb=1 [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In the procedural challenge, the claimant bank relied on a long line of authority, from Cooper v Wandsworth Board of Works [1863] 14 CB (NS) 180 to R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody [1994] 1 AC 531, to assert the well established principle that natural justice will in many cases require that a person likely to be adversely affected by an administrative decision must be given an opportunity to make representations on his own behalf… [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 1:00 pm
Todo muy bien hasta acá. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
As suggested in case law such as Amstrad CBS Songs v Amstrad [1998] 1 AC 1013, procurement, whether by inducement, incitement or persuasion, “must be by a defendant to an individual infringer and must identifiably procure a particular infringement in order to make the defendant liable as a joint infringer”. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 20, Wednesday 21 and Thursday 22 October, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of SC, CB and 8 children v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Ors. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2011] EWCA Civ 1: read judgment. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:45 am
In that recent case, Ace Precision v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application… [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The first is Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd). [read post]
