Search for: "Ackerman Law Office" Results 1 - 20 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 5:07 am by Lawrence Solum
Morrison (Columbia University - Law School) has posted Book Review: Constitutional Alarmism (Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (2010)) (Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:26 pm by Bryn Miller
Amy Ackerman, a former senior deputy city attorney with the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, joined RPLG as Of Counsel in the spring of 2020. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by Stephen Griffin
Ackerman focuses on the presidency as the source of the trouble. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:54 am by rplghannah
Renne Public Law Group (RPLG) congratulates Amy Ackerman on her promotion to Partner effective April 1. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 11:16 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  I thought I would share this article on the subject by Michael Stern, who used to serve in the General Counsel’s office of the House of Representatives and who now blogs at Point of Order on the law relating to legislatures. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Over at Attackerman, Spencer Ackerman has written two posts (here and here) posing challenging question about the legality of the Al Aulaqi strike; in the second post, he also critiques my earlier due process analysis of when a strike against a U.S. citizen can be lawful. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:51 pm
The real slow down on busing began years after Nixon left office. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Ashby Jones
Writing in Wednesday’s WSJ, Yale Law School’s Bruce Ackerman makes a number of interesting observations about the recent dustup concerning President Obama’s recess appointments. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:29 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 As Ackerman notes, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel “traditionally served as the executive branch’s authoritative spokesman on matters of high legal importance,” but no longer. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:35 pm by Ann Althouse
Here, Professor Ackerman quoted a law review article by Thomas Cmar, "Toward a Small Donor Democracy: The Past and Future of Incentive Programs for Small Political Contributions," 32 Fordham Urban Law Journal. 443, 462-75 (2005): Oregon has the highest participation rate in the country for a political contribution incentive program, and in large measure this is due to the state providing the credit for contributions to PACs as well as candidates and parties. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:44 pm
" Law professor Bruce Ackerman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:02 pm by mv284
In the January, 2011 issue of the Michigan Law Review, Professors Ackerman and Hathaway throw Congress a lifeline for reclaiming the authority it lost when the Bush Adminstration unilaterally transformed the limited war in Iraq as originally authorized by Congress into an open-ended conflict. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
To take up German law again, the idea of the chain of legitimacy is crucial – any office, and in the end any administrative decision must potentially be traced back to the democratic sovereign, represented in Parliament. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:14 pm
"West Point professor calls on US military to target legal critics of war on terror; US military academy official William Bradford argues that attacks on scholars' home offices and media outlets -- along with Islamic holy sites -- are legitimate": Spencer Ackerman of The Guardian (UK) has this report. [read post]
” The document was released to the ACLU of Northern California and the Asian Law Caucus as part of a nationwide ACLU initiative to uncover information about a new FBI “racial mapping” program. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:21 am
Ackerman questions whether such a use of military officers is consistent with the tradition -- which I think ought to be called "constitutional" -- of civilian control of the military.On its face, Ackerman's concern is puzzling. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:42 pm by JB
  Marty Lederman, Even if it’s lawful . . . should we be concerned that it sets a dangerous precedent? [read post]