Search for: "Adam Feldman" Results 181 - 200 of 823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Anne Leonore de Bruijn (University of Amsterdam), Yuval Feldman (Bar-Ilan University), Malouke Esra Kuiper (University of Amsterdam), Megan Brownlee (University of Amsterdam), Chris Reinders Folmer (University of Amsterdam), Emmeke Barbara Kooistra (University of Amsterdam), Elke Olthuis (University of Amsterdam), Adam... [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:47 am by James Romoser
Noah Feldman in Bloomberg on why, despite Feldman’s disagreements with Barrett on “nearly everything,” she nonetheless deserves to be on the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:57 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As Adam Feldman notes on EmpiricalSCOTUS, "Trump has a higher rate of "well-qualified" confirmed first time judges than any other president on the list aside from George W. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:26 am by Howard Bashman
“Justice Ginsburg Leaves a Lasting Legacy on the Court”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm by Bridget Crawford
Hill ProfJulieHill Alabama       Shalini Ray shalbharg Alabama immigration professional responsibility civil procedure Adam Steinman Adam_Steinman Alabama       Joyce Vance joycewhitevance Alabama Criminal Law/Procedure Criminal Justice Reform, Civil Rights   Andy Ayers ABlakesleeAyers Albany Immigration Admin Government Ray Brescia rbrescia Albany Access to Justice and Technology Inequality   Ted De Barbieri TedDeBarbieri Albany Community Economic… [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 1:52 pm by Kalvis Golde
The panel will feature Catherine Stetson of Hogan Lovells, Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUS and Jonathan Cohn of Sidley Austin. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:05 am by Howard Bashman
“RBG’s Departure Might Look A Lot Like Thurgood Marshall’s”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Segall, Adam Feldman, The Elite Teaching The Elite: Who Gets Hired By The Top Law Schools? [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 10:38 am by Howard Bashman
“Clear Polarization in Second Level Supreme Court Decision Making”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empiical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
 And in our Final Stat Pack, Adam Feldman breaks down the 2019-20 term using statistical analysis. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines “the justices’ deference to precedent, when they choose to defer, and when they choose not to do so” by looking at “cases where the Court clearly reviewed past decisions since Chief Justice Roberts was appointed to the Court in 2005. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:48 pm by Howard Bashman
Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Feldman offers an interim set of statistics from October Term 2019 for this blog, noting that “[a]Athough [Chief Justice John] Roberts has authored the fewest opinions this term, with three – all majority opinions at that – his opinions and votes have already made quite an impact. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:35 pm by Josh Blackman
[From SCOTUSBlog's Interim Stat Pack] At SCOTUSBlog, Adam Feldman released the interim stat pack. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes instances in which ideologically distant justices have voted together in divided decisions. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “the content of the arguments and at the words spoken” during the court’s unusual May sitting. [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:09 pm by Howard Bashman
“Drilling into the Content of the Supreme Court’s May Arguments”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:29 pm by Judith Gaskell
Adam Feldman has analyzed these new arguments on Scotusblog. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” For this blog, Adam Feldman uses data from “the first week of the Supreme Court’s telephonic oral arguments … to compare old-style oral arguments with the new framework”; he concludes that “[t]he change in argument format offers an interesting lens into potential improvements for oral arguments moving forward. [read post]