Search for: "Adam Steinman" Results 1 - 20 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by Steve Lubet
Degan Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Michigan Law School Joan Steinman, Professor of Law Emerita, Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law Gerald Torres, Jane M.G. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:35 am by Howard Wasserman
The new Courts Law essay comes from co-section-editor Adam Steinman (Alabama), reviewing Stephen B. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The Download of the Week is Access to Justice, Rationality, and Personal Jurisdiction by Adam Steinman. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm by Lawrence Solum
Adam Steinman (University of Alabama - School of Law) has posted Access to Justice, Rationality, and Personal Jurisdiction (Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 1401, 2018) on SSRN. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Scott Pryor profpryor Campbell contracts bankruptcy law & religion Gowri Nanayakkara gowri_nana Canterburgy Christ Church (UK)       Rhonda Powell DrRLPowell Canterbury (NZ)       César Cuauhtémoc Garcia Hernandez crimmigration Capital       Ambreena Manji AmbreenaManji Cardiff       Michelle Adams mvadams12 Cardozo Constitutiona [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:54 am by Howard Wasserman
The new Courts Law essay comes from section co-editor Adam Steinman (Alabama), reviewing Seth Davis & Christopher A. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
 At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman observes that “[t]he big question going forward will be what is required to rebut the majority’s look-through presumption. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman observes that an remark by Justice Elena Kagan during oral argument highlighted “the same concerns that others have identified with allowing dissenting Justices to determine the binding content of Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:18 am by Howard Bashman
“Some Thoughts on the Hughes Argument and Logical Subsets”: Adam Steinman has this post at his “Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Yale Law Journal, Adam Steinman offers a framework for analyzing the issue in Hughes v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:21 am by Joe Hodnicki
Here’s the abstract for Adam Steinman’s Non-Majority Opinions and Biconditional Rules, Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 128 (Forthcoming): In Hughes v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:48 am by Howard Bashman
“Non-Majority Opinions and Biconditional Rules”: Law professor Adam Steinman has posted this essay online at SSRN (via “Legal Theory Blog“). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
Adam Steinman (University of Alabama - School of Law) has posted Non-Majority Opinions and Biconditional Rules (Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 128 (Forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Adam Steinman (University of Alabama - School of Law) has posted Lost in Transplantation: The Supreme Court's Post-Prudence Jurisprudence (Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc, vol. 70, p.289) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:00 am by mes286
University of Georgia Law School Adam Steinman, University Research Professor of Law, University of Alabama Law, presents today as part of the Faculty Colloquium Series. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 11:34 am by Lawrence Solum
Adam Steinman (University of Alabama - School of Law) has posted Case Law (Boston University Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1947, 2017) on SSRN. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Adam Steinman (University of Alabama - School of Law) has posted Case Law (Boston University Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1947, 2017) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:01 am by Joe Hodnicki
Here’s the abstract for Adam Steinman’s very interesting article simply titled Case Law, Boston University Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1947, 2017: Although case law plays a crucial role in the American legal system, surprisingly little consensus exists on how to determine the “law” that any given “case” generates. [read post]