Search for: "Adam Steinman"
Results 81 - 100 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2010, 1:11 pm by Dan Markel
Resources: Bookmark the Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog, maintained by civ pro prawfs extraordinaire Robin Effron, Cynthia Fountaine, and Adam Steinman, which has useful information about recent cases and scholarship. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:57 am by Walter Olson
[Adam Steinman, Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, earlier here, here; see also Archis Parasharami, Mayer Brown "Class Defense"] Relatedly, “Taking on Class Action abuse: A conversation with Ted Frank, founder of the Center for Class Action Fairness” is a new podcast at Liberty Law. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Steinman, The Lay of the Land: Examining the Three Opinions in J. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:56 pm
Hendricks that proposes revisions to the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, an essay by Adam N. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
   Peter Snyder reported on the decision in Atlantic Marine for JURIST, while Adam Steinman analyzed it at the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:36 pm by Paul Horwitz
We will be joined next year by five new colleagues: Adam Steinman, one of the leading young figures in civil procedure and federal courts; Jenny Carroll, who has been doing terrific work on criminal procedure, among other areas; Mirit Eyal-Cohen, an important emerging figure in the area of tax law; Yuri Linetsky, who will be adding to our significant clinical programs; and John Gross, an accomplished and experienced criminal defense attorney who also will be… [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:00 pm
DirecTV Eleventh Circuit decision, and in keeing with that commitment, here's a commentary from Professor Adam Steinman of Seton Hall University School of Law with his thoughts on the "puzzling" decision rendered in Cappuccitti: Commentary on Recent CAFA Decision (Cappuccitti v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Adam Steinman discusses voting alignments on the Court, including one that involves “a fascinating (if trivial) feature that I don’t recall seeing in any other Supreme Court decision. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:30 am by Adam Steinman
Adam Steinman It may not be the most headline-grabbing issue on the Supreme Court’s docket. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:45 am
 As noted by Adam Steinman at Concurring Opinions, Justice O’Connor wrote a concurrence to, and Justice Scalia wrote a dissent from, Justice Breyer’s first opinion. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Adam Steinman (Cincinnati) tries to do the same in a research paper posted at SSRN.Perhaps most dramatically, Assistant Professor Kenneth S. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:43 am by Amanda Frost
Professor Adam Steinman reaches the same conclusion in his article The Pleading Problem, published in the Stanford Law Review.   [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
” At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman discusses the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which the Court adopted on Wednesday. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am by Matt Sundquist
At Concurring Opinions, Adam Steinman discusses Ashcroft v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:49 pm by Dan Filler
Thomas (Minnesota) Mark Osler from Baylor San Francisco Tristan Green from Seton Hall Santa Clara David Hasen from Penn State Seattle John Eason from Tulane Seton Hall Adam Steinman from Cincinnati Stanford John Donohue from Yale Texas Matthew Spitzer from Southern California (and Cal Tech) James Spindler from Southern California Texas Wesleyan Gabriel Eckstein from Texas Tech Peter Reilly from Nevada - Las Vegas (into tenure track position) Cynthia Alkon from Appalachian Touro… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:15 am by MBettman
  In slot number eight was a Guest Post by my former colleague Adam Steinman, now at the University of Alabama School of Law, entitled, Standing and Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Ohio Foreclosure Actions: A Third Way? [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
 Adam Steinman discusses the oral argument at Opinio Juris, where he predicts that “it appears unlikely that the Court will endorse the Ninth Circuit’s conclusion that general personal jurisdiction existed over Daimler,” but adds that “it is possible that the Court’s opinion will be a narrow one. [read post]