Search for: "Adam Wagner" Results 81 - 100 of 466
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2015, 10:19 am by lauraprofumo
UKHRB’s Adam Wagner finds its guidance “vague and muddled”, though the possibility of ECHR-withdrawal is significantly absent. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:38 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Douglas Wagner, socio encargado de la gerencia de Warner Norcross & Judd LLP, expresó que el caso es demasiado controversial al punto que envuelve fuertes emociones de clientes, socios y empleados a favor de cada una de las posturas. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:34 am by acwessely
Other: RightsInfo RightsInfo – the new project set up by this Blog’s very own Adam Wagner, will be launched on Tuesday 21st April. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:58 pm by hannahlynes
Speaking at the event on 29 April will be UKHRB General Editor Adam Wagner as well as Patricia Ayodeji, Sue Willman and Professor Sara Chandler. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:49 am
"Danger invites rescue"  Justice Cardozo famously wrote in 1926 in Wagner v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:32 am by Joao Pedro Quintais
The case marks the seventh occasion on which the Court has ruled on the issue of the private copying limitation under art. 5(2)(b) Directive 2001/29/EC (the ‘Directive’), following Padawan, Stichting de Thuiskopie, Luksan, VG Wort, and, most recently, ACI Adam. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Teece (Berkeley Business); Shine Tu (WVU); Polk Wagner (Penn); Brian Wright (Berkeley Ag-Econ); Christopher S. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:45 am by acju538
Barrister and UKHRB founding editor Adam Wagner speaks at a seminar on the future of human rights in the UK at 1pm on 12 May, hosted by the Oxford Law Faculty. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:36 am by Michael Deacon
Photo via Begraj v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 250 (QB) – Read judgment Adam Wagner acted for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:48 am by sally
The panel for the evening includes: • Adam Wagner (1 Crown Office Row, UK Human Rights Blog); • Angela Patrick (Director of Human Rights Policy, JUSTICE); • Kirsty Brimelow QC (Doughty Street Chambers); and • Jon Holbrook (Barrister & Writer for Spiked). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
 •National Trends and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Engagement; Rightsizing •The National Trust and Section 106 Advocacy •Litigating a Section 106 Case from Start to Finish10:00 am - Preserving America’s CitiesModerator: Tersh Boasberg, Georgetown Law Panelists: Peter Byrne, Georgetown Law Mark Silberman, Counsel, NYC Landmarks Preservation CommissionIngrid Gould Ellen, NYU Wagner School of Public Policy •DC's Special… [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:17 am by Doorey
By Professor Roy Adams In my recent comment on the Law of Work Blog on the Supreme Court’s MPAO v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:37 am by Rosalind English
Look at what happened to the “free press” after Charlie Hebdo (Adam Wagner’s post here). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Louis University Colleen Chien colleen_chien Santa Clara Luis Chiesa proflchiesa SUNY Buffalo Adam Chilton adamschilton Chicago Andrew Chin chinunc UNC Kenneth Ching kennyching Regent Cyra Akila Choudhury cyrachoudhury Florida International Allison Christians taxpolblog McGill Chester Chuang ChesterChuang Golden Gate Danielle Citron daniellecitron Maryland Bradford Clark profbradclark George Washington Sherman Clark shermanjclark Michigan Brian Clarke Bclarke_LawProf Charlotte Donald C. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 2:23 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Photo credit: Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police v Scott Calder [2015] – judgment not yet available Adam Wagner represented Scott Calder in this case. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:50 am by Rosalind English
That then obliged the Court to consider male circumcision, and the somewhat different approach of the law to this procedure (see Adam Wagner’s post on a 2012 ruling by the Cologne Regional Court that male circumcision could be a criminal assault – translation here). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:42 pm by Jag
Tory MP David Davies somehow came to the conclusion that the attacks in Paris “show [the] need to scrap the Human Rights Act” – an argument which betrays an embarrassing ignorance as to the law, and one which was rubbished with little difficulty by Adam Wagner and Mark Elliott, who summed up particularly well: “To the extent that the Paris shootings are relevant at all to the debate about human-rights law in the UK, their significance is not that… [read post]