Search for: "Adams Express v. New York" Results 81 - 100 of 403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 4:32 pm
No luck for the Englishman in New York, as the selfie was declared unprotectable by a US court because it was shot by a non-human [see here,  here and here for previous posts on this case]. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that the court “adopted a strict interpretation of a federal immigration law, saying it required the detention of immigrants facing deportation without the possibility of bail if they had committed crimes, including minor ones, no matter how long ago they had been released from criminal custody. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
On 11 March 2019, three new media law silks were appointed: Adam Wolanski QC, William Bennett QC and Christina Michalos QC – all from 5RB. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Leiter also notes that, during the 1930s, the University of Chicago hired, as one of its new faculty members, a PhD in Philosophy even though he lacked a degree in law. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Robinson v Day  2019 NY Slip Op 30153(U)  January 16, 2019  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 600907/2010  Judge: O. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
On Nov. 14, Adam Raishani, a 32-year-old from the Bronx, New York, pleaded guilty in the Southern District of New York to attempt and conspiracy material support charges. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The change was sparked by a decision by a federal judge in New York who ruled that the key verse in the song was not protected under copyright for lack of originality. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:44 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Considers a Thorny Question of Free Speech and Police Power”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:40 am by Andrew Hamm
News essay, Chief Justice Rehnquist continued to fear the influence of clerks,” as Adam Liptak wrote for The New York Times in 2008. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[m]uch of the argument concerned whether paying the plaintiffs was practicable. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Adam Liptak, New York Times] The transcript of oral argument, in which several Justices expressed doubt that the lower court had adequately pinned down standing issues, is here. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
As Adam Liptak observes in The New York Times, the court’s docket presents “lower-profile but still consequential legal questions” that may allow the justices “to find ways to bridge the usual ideological divides” amid the continuing battle over the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the court. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 10:41 am by Kevin Goldberg
News organizations and other content users will welcome these two decisions, especially in light of the Goldman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Getting together to do a national We’re-Not-The-Enemy-Of-The-People Day might not play to the strengths of an independent press [Jack Shafer; New York Post on why it did join, and L.A. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am by Andrew Hamm
Adam Liptak of The New York Times surveys 12 sets of evaluations spanning 700 pages from about 350 law students at Harvard, Yale and Georgetown and finds “almost only glowing praise for Judge Kavanaugh’s teaching. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
For the New York Times, Alicia Parlapiano and Jugal Patel present visual graphics leading to a similar conclusion. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:07 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Mulroney holds an American law degree and was licensed in New York State, but is not a licensee in Ontario. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Tim Wu argues that Monday’s decision in Ohio v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Will Baude
But the more important, and first, Supreme Court reference to the "court of history" is in New York Times v. [read post]