Search for: "Adams v. Adams" Results 21 - 40 of 7,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am by Above the Law
 In a Feb. 19 letter, the nonprofit organization American Oversight requested an immediate investigation into whether Bove violated New York attorney conduct rules when handling the Adams case, including alleged attempts of his ‘to induce other lawyers to engage in unethical behavior. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am by Ryan Goodman
” [For analysis of this issue, see article by Adam Cox and Trevor Morrison] Starting on 1/20 (and including 1/27) See also entries below at 1/31 and 2/28Removal & reassignment of DOJ officials, including in positions of national security, ethics oversight, and public corruption investigationsTrump administration/acting Deputy Attorney General Emil BoveOfficials within the DOJ’s Executive Office for Immigration Review were removed from their positions. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am by Dan Bressler
At least that’s what a Magistrate Judge in the District of New Jersey decided last week in Harish v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 2:28 am by INFORRM
In Adams v Amazon Digital UK Ltd  [2024] EWHC 3338 (KB), the defendant (‘Amazon’) obtained reverse summary  judgment in a claim for libel and misuse of private information (‘MOPI’). [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 4:41 am by Weronika Galka
Reilly, Frank Thorp V, and Dareh Gregorian report for NBC News. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:57 am by Andrew Weissmann
The Current Status of the Adams Case In an exceedingly rare move, the Trump-Bondi Justice Department has sought to dismiss, without prejudice, the Adams indictment. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 7:00 am by Just Security
by Kal Raustiala Trump Administration / Northern Europe A Nordic ‘Trump-Mitigation’ Strategy Amid a Return of Power Politics by Erlingur Erlingsson Sudan Understanding Sudan’s Conflict by Focusing on Darfur by Tajedin Abdalla Adam New York / Corruption The People of New York v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 12:11 pm by David Post
  And surely you know how interested President Trump is in the outcome of X v. [read post]