Search for: "Adams v. Church" Results 121 - 140 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
’ Former Putnam County, New York, District Attorney Adam Levy has received a $150,000 settlement in his defamation case against Putnam Sheriff Don Smith. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
In a column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:38 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard argument in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Stapleton, which asks whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s exemption for church plans applies to pension plans maintained by church-affiliated organizations. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Stapleton (consolidated with two other related cases), which asks whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s exemption for church plans applies to pension plans maintained by church-affiliated organizations. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of the Turkmen cases comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Adam Steinman at the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:46 am by Edith Roberts
Rollins, a pending cert petition involving the scope of ERISA’s exemption for church health plans. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy previews Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Schiedegger responds to Akil Amar’s recent commentary on the exclusionary rule in this blog’s symposium on the Court after Scalia, contending that last Term’s decision in Utah v. [read post]