Search for: "Adams v. Cook"
Results 41 - 60
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2021, 11:34 am
Freeport McMoran, Inc., 35 F.3d 1008, 1013 (5th Cir. 1994) Adams v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:30 am
Cook in 1998, but by the time the Court examined the immediate precursor to AWA a decade later in State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
The record clearly establishes an attorney-client relationship, as defendant entered into two stipulations extending Billiard’s time to answer in an underlying personal injury action, which were filed in court, and represented itself as Billiard’s attorney (see Cooke v Laidlaw Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453, 455 [1st Dept 1987]; compare Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94, 99 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:05 pm
Nye Today’s ruling from the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm
Adams. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm
Adams. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm
Adams. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 12:30 am
This week there's a review of Who Cooked Adam Smith's Dinner? [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Mark Mason v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 5:58 am
City of Philadelphia: The Supreme Court Considers the Religious License to Discriminate, Again (Currey Cook, Lambda Legal) Preview of Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:06 am
This evidence is sufficient for a fact-finder to determine that defendant breached its duty of loyalty to plaintiff, a former client (see Cooke v Laidlaw, Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453, 456 [1st Dept 1987] [ethical standards applying to the practice of law impose a continuing obligation upon lawyers to refuse employment in matters adversely affecting a client’s interests, even if the client is a former client]). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Cook, the court reached that conclusion unanimously; ten years later, in State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In Foley’s view, the Jeffersonian goal underlying the Twelfth Amendment of 1804 was not merely to cure the mischief arising from the fact that electors were obligated to cast two “undifferentiated” votes for president—the great misstep that led to the Burr-Jefferson tie of 1800 and to Hamilton’s several attempts to throw votes away from John Adams. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:24 am
Jeremiah Guthrie v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Adame-Hernandez, Seventh Circuit: The district court withdrew Appellant's guilty plea over his objection. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Nye charted the patient’s response to her recommendation as “the patient and her husband are adamant about vaginal delivery and do not want a Cesarean section. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
Kuchta cited Pratts v. [read post]
