Search for: "Adams v. Cox" Results 21 - 40 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Subscribe to Now & Then, hosted by historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman: Apple Podcasts, SpotifyNow & Then, “Entangling Alliances,” 6/1/21NY Penal Law §460.20 - Enterprise corruptionEric Swalwell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
As we noted in a prior post, the "no prisoners" approach has resulted in adamant opposition to all efforts at access. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Showcased most prominently in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 4:38 pm by Brett Burlison
” In coming to this conclusion, the Court took the unusual and significant step in overruling its own precedent, Adams v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:00 pm
Cox, Inc.), and the petitioner has filed a supplemental brief concerning the Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Adam Cox, Ryan Goodman and Cristina Rodriguez well described the court’s standard: “[E]ven if we know that an immigration policy was motivated by blatant official animus against a religion, the policy should be sustained so long as the government proffers some rational national security basis for it. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:30 pm by Jack Chin
In a column today, Adam Liptak discusses some familiar criticisms of law reviews. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
As Professors Adam Cox and Cristina Rodríguez wrote soon after the case was decided, Roberts’s opinion was “as ominous as it [was] encouraging,” insofar as it appeared to provide a “roadmap” for DACA to be successfully terminated and to create barriers to “a future Biden administration’s ability to pursue a humanitarian path going forward. [read post]