Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 6:04 am
New York and Clinton v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:12 pm
“States Are Not Entitled to Windfalls in Tax Disputes, Supreme Court Rules; In a unanimous decision, the justices sided with a 94-year-old woman who got nothing when a Minnesota county sold her condominium to recoup unpaid taxes”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
23 May 2023, 1:10 pm
In the 1964 New York Times v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:42 pm
“Supreme Court Upholds California Law on Humane Treatment of Pigs; The court ruled that the measure did not violate constitutional limits on state laws that affect conduct beyond the state’s borders”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:34 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court rejects challenge to California pork industry restriction (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Moore v Harper parties split on whether US Supreme Court should drop case (CJ Staff, The Carolina Journal) Supreme Court Throws Out Fraud Convictions in Albany Scandals (Adam Liptak & Luis Ferré-Sadurní, The New York Times) Supreme Court rules against Puerto Rican journalists seeking records from… [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am
Madison’s attack on the Sedition Act laid the foundation for the Supreme Court’s landmark press freedom decision, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm
“Supreme Court Wary of Windfall in Seizure of Condo for Unpaid Taxes; The justices considered the constitutionality of letting states keep all the proceeds of the sale of confiscated property even when they far exceed the taxpayer’s debt”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
There is a big difference between reading Linda Greenhouse and Adam Liptak. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
An intertribal business court. / Crepelle, Adam C. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 4:30 pm
“Supreme Court Weighs Clash of Postal Worker’s Sabbath and Sunday Deliveries; The justices have been receptive to claims of religious freedom and may take a broad view of a federal law that requires employers to ‘reasonably accommodate’ workers’ religious practices”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 5:03 pm
Without reaching trial or a verdict, the Dominion Voting Systems v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
New York County Supreme Court Justice Bannon granted a preliminary injunction enjoining the election predetermined by the voting agreement, finding: Here, the terms of the voting agreement . . . suggest that Adam has sought to trade ALP’s most valuable asset in order to regain his position as President of ALP to oust Libra . . . and resume his alleged improper diversion of corporate assets . . . [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:19 pm
New York, 139 S. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York recently held that, as a matter of first impression, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA) does not invalidate a binding arbitration agreement if the plaintiff fails to plead a plausible sexual harassment claim. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 6:54 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: A Chew Toy for Dogs Provokes a Spirited Supreme Court Argument (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Republican Ted Cruz introduces bill to block US supreme court expansion (Martin Pengelly, The Guardian) How Ginsburg’s death and Kavanaugh’s maneuvering shaped the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm
“A Chew Toy for Dogs Provokes a Spirited Supreme Court Argument; The justices differed about whether the toy, shaped like a bottle of Jack Daniel’s, violated the distiller’s trademark rights or was protected by the First Amendment”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:38 am
The New York Times' Adam Liptak has an interesting "Sidebar" column on a case raising the question of whether a court's decision to allow a witness to testify over Zoom violated a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 2:09 am
V. (2004). [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Q: At least 26 cases have relied on the HEAR Act, including Zucherman v Metropolitan Museum of Art [2]and Reif v Nagy.[3] How effective has the new Act been at getting with museums and collectors to do the right thing? [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Student Loan Case Could Redefine Limits of Presidential Power DNyuz – Michael Shear and Adam Liptak (New York Times) | Published: 3/1/2023 One of President Biden’s most ambitious proposals, a $400 billion program to forgive student loan debt for 40 million Americans, could become the latest victim of a legal tug of war with the U.S. [read post]
