Search for: "Adams v. New York" Results 141 - 160 of 2,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm
"Supreme Court Seems Poised to Deal Unions a Major Setback": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this news update. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:20 am by Steve Hall
"Court to Hear Case Stalled by Mistake in Mailroom," is the title of Adam Liptak's New York Times report. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Yesterday, nearly thirteen years after the accident at issue, the New York Court of Appeals, that state's highest court, affirmed that verdict in Adams v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
Other early coverage comes from Pete Williams of NBC News; Roberts Barnes of The Washington Post; Josh Gerstein of Politico; Lydia Wheeler of The Hill; Mark Sherman of the Associated Press; Lawrence Hurley of Reuters; Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Christian Farias of New York Magazine; Chris Geidner of Buzzfeed; Richard Wolf of USA Today; and Kevin Daley of The Daily Caller. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:24 am by Steve Hall
" is the title of Adam Liptak's report in today's New York Times.The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide whether it is too late for an Alabama man to argue that the murder that sent him to death row was not a capital crime when he committed it. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
His Sidebar column in today's New York Times is, "After 34 Years, a Plainspoken Justice Gets Louder. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
An estimated 10,000 migrants are arriving in New York each month, overwhelming the city’s homeless shelters, which now house more than 112,300 people. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Steve Hall
"Justices Allow Inmates to Sue for DNA Testing," by Adam Liptak in the New York Times. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This morning's New York Times features a front-page story by Adam Liptak noting that President Trump's two Supreme Court nominees—Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh—disagree more than one might expect. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: Adam Liptak visits The New York Times’ podcast The Daily to talk about Department of Commerce v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm by Howard Bashman
In other coverage, Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports that “Supreme Court Urged to Reject Mississippi’s Attack on Roe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
Source: Article by Adam Liptak in March 10, 2007 New York Times. "Interpreting the Second Amendment broadly, a federal appeals court in Washington yesterday struck down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that bars residents from keeping handguns in their homes. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:14 am by Steve Hall
His Sidebar column in today's New York Times is, "Defendants Squeezed by Georgia’s Tight Budget. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:02 pm
"Court Weighs How Juries Should Hear Lab Evidence," is Adam Liptak's report in today's New York Times.The Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday in a case that could have broad implications for how prosecutors present evidence from crime laboratories at trial. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:33 am
City of New York, it addressed what constitutes adequate notice of a sidewalk defect for purposes of what has become commonly known as the 'Pothole Law'; and in Matter of Rivera v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:14 am by Dan Ernst
New York (1905) decision from the perspective of the history of economic thought. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
"Weighing Reach of Law in Appeals for Clemency": Today in The New York Times, Adam Liptak has an article that begins, "In an unusually testy argument, the Supreme Court on Monday tried to make sense of a federal law that provides lawyers to poor inmates on state death rows when their cases move to federal court. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:42 pm
"Ruling on Guns Elicits Rebuke From the Right": Today in The New York Times, Adam Liptak has an article that begins, "Four months after the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess guns, its decision is under assault -- from the right. [read post]