Search for: "Adams v. Texas" Results 221 - 240 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 5:58 am by James Romoser
Texas, the constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Peter Jacobs
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In Foley’s view, the Jeffersonian goal underlying the Twelfth Amendment of 1804 was not merely to cure the mischief arising from the fact that electors were obligated to cast two “undifferentiated” votes for president—the great misstep that led to the Burr-Jefferson tie of 1800 and to Hamilton’s several attempts to throw votes away from John Adams. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:38 am by James Romoser
Adams, a First Amendment case about whether Delaware can choose its state judges based on party affiliation, and Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:15 am by James Romoser
Adams, a First Amendment case about whether Delaware can choose its state judges based on party affiliation, and Texas v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Adam Liptak of the New York Times writes that the decision in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
In Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Federalist Society blog, Adam Forester Griffin observes that although the court declined on Monday to review Lech v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]