Search for: "Adams v. Texas"
Results 21 - 40
of 984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
He has had a bumpy ride of late, what with the leak of the decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Activist, Advance Notice Bylaw, Blasius, Bylaw, Chancery, Coster, Kellner, Schnell, Stockholder, Unocal When Myopic Managers Must Mark to Market Posted by Adam Kolasinski (Texas A&M University), and Nan Yang (Hong Kong Polytechnic University), on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Banks, CEOs, Executives, Liquidity CSRD… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Activist, Advance Notice Bylaw, Blasius, Bylaw, Chancery, Coster, Kellner, Schnell, Stockholder, Unocal When Myopic Managers Must Mark to Market Posted by Adam Kolasinski (Texas A&M University), and Nan Yang (Hong Kong Polytechnic University), on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Banks, CEOs, Executives, Liquidity CSRD… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am
Matina Stevis-Gridneff, Monika Pronczuk, and Adam Rasgon report for the New York Times. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
Texas , we considered how this ruling would bode for DACA and other immigration policies . [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 3:40 pm
From today's decision by the Texas Court of Appeals (First District) in Zoanni v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In Alabama v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Trump’s Claim That He Can’t Be Prosecuted Collides with Precedents Yahoo News – Adam Liptak (New York Times) | Published: 10/12/2023 Among the bold claims in a recent motion filed by Donald Trump seeking to dismiss the federal indictment accusing him of conspiring to undermine the 2020 election, there was a significant concession. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
., University of Texas at Austin, Class of 2004 SELECT PUBLICATIONS Alll For One Or One For All? [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Adams Professor of Constitutional Law and Professor of History, discusses whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:39 pm
(See Moser v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:37 am
Lenz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
