Search for: "Adams v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 2,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 2:11 pm by fvanloon
Reports suggest that the Ukrainian Embassy was a hotbed of anti-Trump, Deep State activism and tried to promote and protect leftist allies in Ukraine and the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:18 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Adams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am by John Elwood
Adams, 19-309 Issues: (1) Whether the First Amendment invalidates a longstanding state constitutional provision that limits judges affiliated with any one political party to no more than a “bare majority” on the state’s three highest courts, with the other seats reserved for judges affiliated with the “other major political party”; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:16 am by fvanloon
The suit was filed after the Justice Department failed to respond to an October 1, 2019, FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
It appears that when President Trump seemed poised to stop the review, Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re writes that in Kansas v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
Mother was a citizen of Canada; Father was a citizen of the United States who had status to live and work in Canada because Mother sponsored his application for a visa. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6086Issue: Whether the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act’s delegation to the Attorney General in 34 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Chinmayi Sharma
When asked by Chairman Adam Schiff him whether Burisma was included in the call package as a topic to discuss on the call with Zelensky, Morrison’s counsel instructed him not to answer the question, citing U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
United States], in which the Supreme Court decided that the warrant-less seizure of the plaintiff’s cell phone records violated his Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Bull, research director of the Administrative Conference of the United States; Colleen V. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolfe reports that the court “appeared likely to side with the Trump administration in its effort to end a program that lets nearly 700,000 young, undocumented immigrants live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:31 pm by fvanloon
And I suspect he went into the White House knowing he was going to spy and he was going to try to undermine the president of the United States as best he could. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As David points out very early, the Court recognized and embraced implied powers fourteen years earlier, in United States v. [read post]