Search for: "Adams v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2010, 7:41 am by John Steele
The GOP continues to push the idea that there are improper conflicts within DOJ because lawyers who formerly represented Guantanamo detainees now represent the United States on related issues.   [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 9:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
WilsonOn remand from United States Supreme CourtState v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:41 am by E.L. Lipman
In February of last year, in a case denominated as United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:45 am by Eric Muller
Adam Liptak today covers an effort to persuade the Solicitor General to try to persuade the Supreme Court to use the pending cert petition in Hedges v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, invalidating the federal corruption convictions of former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak previews next month’s argument in Warger v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 8:40 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” KSR, 550 U.S. at 416 (citing United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
   It appears, from the affidavits, that in compliance with this law, a commission for William Marbury as a justice of peace for the county of Washington, was signed by John Adams, then president of the United States; after which the seal of the United States was affixed to it; but the commission has never reached the person for whom it was made out. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:42 am
United States Congress: Is there Any Room for God? [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:59 am by NCC Staff
On April 18, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in one of the most important cases of the current Supreme Court term: United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
For example, the Tillis-Coons bill (the “Special Counsel Integrity Act”) already provides that “An action filed under this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of 3 judges not later than 14 days after the date on which the action is filed in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 1:25 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Driver's Momentary Stop Not Submission to Police Authority for Fourth Amendment Seizure United States, appellee v. [read post]