Search for: "Adams v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 2,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:16 am by stu@crimapp.com
In United States v Adams, Sixth Circuit No. 08-5372, the Sixth Circuit reversed the Defendant’s conviction based on a corpus delecti rule. ...Rejecting the proposed instruction was error even though there was some evidence that tended to corroborate defendant’s confession (the gun was found in a jacket near defendant) because the jury was not ever advised that corroboration was necessary. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:48 am by Howard Bashman
United States: SCOTUS to address the binding effect of non-majority opinions. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:30 pm
Comstock (No. 08-1224) United States Supreme Court Decision: May 17, 2010 In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
Adams, plaintiff brought suit in 2005 against defendant Mary Noel Adams stemming from defendant’s use of the trademark PHASE FORWARD.After the Trademark Dilution Revision Act was enacted in October 2006, defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s mark did not meet the amended definition of a “famous mark” as one “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:21 am by Joe Hodnicki
Here’s the abstract for Adam Steinman’s Non-Majority Opinions and Biconditional Rules, Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 128 (Forthcoming): In Hughes v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:55 am by Brian Wolfman
Read Lyle Denniston's coverage here and Adam Liptak's coverage here. [read post]