Search for: "Adams v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am
On December 30, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit handed down a major opinion in in Adams v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:48 am
United States: SCOTUS to address the binding effect of non-majority opinions. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:00 pm
United States, No. 13-9026. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Adams v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
Adams, plaintiff brought suit in 2005 against defendant Mary Noel Adams stemming from defendant’s use of the trademark PHASE FORWARD.After the Trademark Dilution Revision Act was enacted in October 2006, defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s mark did not meet the amended definition of a “famous mark” as one “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 2:15 am
Finally, the article will highlight the legal problems posed by § 3509(m) and comment on current case law, including the pending case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:02 pm
Finally, the article will highlight the legal problems posed by § 3509(m) and comment on current case law, including the pending case of United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
Then his case was then taken all the way to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm
Last week in a 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
