Search for: "Adoption of Michael H. (1995)" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by Amber Walsh
”[1] Despite such ominous predictions, investors have not been deterred and in fact, put more money into medical device companies in 2012 than in 2010, or any year in the decade between 1995 and 2005. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am by Jack Goldsmith
” The 1995 Dellinger opinion provided an explanation for this statement. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
10 May 2008, 11:55 am
” According to James H. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
  The Court’s selection of these cases, quite irrelevant to its discussion, appears to have come from the Solicitor General’s amicus brief in Matrixx, but mindlessly adopted by the Court. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Chien & Michael Risch, Recalibrating Patent Venue, Santa Clara Univ. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Moderator
“The current system is not workable,” says H. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:02 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Michael Weiss and Abdulla Hawez of the Daily Beast feature a story on how Moqtada al Sadr could take down Iraq’s government here. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
In 1987, the advocate scientists were able to move the IARC to adopt a “limited evidence” classification for crystalline silica. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
It was adopted the same year the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified, at a time when formerly enslaved persons were newly able to work for their own benefit. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 It was filed against former Chairman of the Board and CEO Michael Perry in July 2011 seeking $600 million in damages, alleging in a single count that Perry, solely in his capacity as an officer (i.e., CEO), had been negligent. [19]  The complaint in Perry is noteworthy for several reasons including [read post]