Search for: "Aetna Insurance Company v. U. S" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
 If the plan has an "issuer" responsible for payments, such as Aetna, that issuer's preexisting responsibility for providing contraceptive coverage will continue, albeit outside the auspices of the employer's plan, and without any involvement of the objecting employer. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm by Marty Lederman
Circuit case, however--Priests for Life and Catholic University--offer health coverage to employees (and in the case of Catholic U., to students) under insured plans; and a third, Thomas Aquinas College, offers health coverage to its employees under a self-insured plan that is not alleged to be a “church plan. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]