Search for: "Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm by John Stigi and Kristin Housh
Although the Court in MIC declined to opine on whether the other two subsections of Rule 10b-5 — Rules 10b-5(a) and 10b-5(c) — may support liability for pure omissions, in Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan Moss
On appeal, Barclays contended that the district court erred in granting class certification by: (1) concluding that the presumption of reliance for omissions of material information, as recognized in Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[8]  Since plaintiffs’ claims concerned misstatements and not omissions, the district court improperly applied the Affiliated Ute presumption of reliance. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
The defendants in these cases are all associated with Occupy SLC, which is part of the larger Occupy Movement, a loose affiliation of groups throughout the United State that formed to draw public attention to the growing economic and social inequality between the rich and poor in this country. 2. [read post]