Search for: "Agnew v. United States" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
The Oct. 5, 1973, Brief for the United States in In re Agnew. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Dominic Chambers QC will conclude his submissions on behalf of the second respondent, Dos Santos, before handing over to the barristers representing the applicants in the Northern Ireland proceedings – Agnew and others and McCord. 13:04: In response to the Appellant saying he does not [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am by Scott Bomboy
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 5:58 am by Kiersten Frenchu
Over the last decade, many state and local governments have taken action on the issue of obesity by mandating calorie labels on menus. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a challenge brought by young people against the federal government’s handling of climate change going back to … well, the Space Age. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
The nation could thus be deeply divided, in a hard-to-resolve way, on the very basic question: Who is the (acting) president of the United States? [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
That is one way that the Constitution-in-practice (as opposed to your or my particular vision of the ideal Constitution) tends to stay in sync with the center of political power in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]