Search for: "Aiken v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2007, 12:28 am
FISA was designed to address the issues left open by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Liskow & Lewis
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:21 pm
United States for those who want their news unfiltered. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Today, the North Carolina Court of Appeals said that it did not have the authority to adopt the "new" standard for consideration of a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion articulated last year by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 7:14 am by E. R. Wrigley
Underpinning the decision in this case are two key cases, N v Home Secretary [2005] UKHL 31 and D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR 423. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Court has, however, reviewed the record and takes particular note of the recent orders issued by the United States Supreme Court on July 30, 2018, and November 2, 2018, as well as the extraordinary Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]