Search for: "Aiken v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
United States, 2016 WL 6661146 (D. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The global system changing preferences https://t.co/vhrMiVy6P7 -> What to expect from the Privacy Shield and the General Data Protection Regulation https://t.co/9eWVTwODMl -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-02-07 https://t.co/R5TlBDEhsu -> Website HTML Is Copyrightable, Even If Look and Feel Is Not https://t.co/zULniqHfRC -> Trans-Pacific Partnership Takes On E-Commerce, Cybersecurity And Encryption – International Law – United States… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:12 am
The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Aikens LJ and Simon J, [2014] EWHC 4167 (Admin) described Pham as “a British resident” and dismissed his appeal; the court held at para 91 that in its “view whether the appellant is a British citizen or not makes no difference to his relevant article 6 rights. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
’’’ Aiken v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Prior to assuming the role of Chief Judge, Judge Aiken launched the District of Oregon’s Reentry Court—one of the first in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Aiken: The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an “author’s” creative labor. [read post]
