Search for: "Ainsworth v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Mr Ainsworth’s cross-appeal, on the other hand, partly succeeds and partly fails. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:35 am
Supreme Court Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & Ors [2011] UKSC 41 (27 July 2011) Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 38 (27 July 2011) Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40 (27 July 2011) Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 42 (27 July 2011) Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (27 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Newspaper… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
" Secretary of State v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the government’s… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
” its an area of law fraught with problems (in the UK matters where somewhat clarified by the 'Star Wars' case of Lucasfilms v Ainsworth).Here in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis (No. 2:10-cv-02508) Judge Robert H Cleland concluded that a cheerleading uniform is not protected without the distinctive stripes, chevrons, zigzags, and colorblocks, and therefore the… [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:46 am
Ainsworth v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:46 am
Ainsworth v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am
Application of the Moçambique principle follows the Supreme Court decision in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth ([2011] UKSC 39) and its application in Chugai v UCB ([2017] EWHC 1216 (Pat)). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
The lawsuit, Almerico et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
Lucasfilm Limited & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
In the most high profile intellectual property dispute to reach the Supreme Court to date, the justices were asked in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39, [2011] All ER (D) 257 (Jul) to consider who owns the rights to the storm trooper helmets from the Star Wars films: Mr Ainsworth, a UK designer, or the director George Lucas’ company, Lucasfilm. [read post]
