Search for: "Alabama Power Co. v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
  Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The complication here is that the VRA’s requirements with which the Arizona commission seems to have, in good faith, been trying to comply have since been deemed by the Supreme Court (in the Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 9:58 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court found that Supreme Court decisions in Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]