Search for: "Alabama v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 2,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Jon Robinson
  Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
Ten Republican attorneys general (AGs) filed a multi-state amicus brief Monday with the US Supreme Court in the Pennsylvania mail-in ballot challenge, Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
But it seems that he took “the forum” to mean Alabama rather than the United States and referenced Ala. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:56 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Maples v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm by Lawyer Sanders
The settlement, filed in federal court today, covers 28 of McWane’s manufacturing facilities in 14 states and also requires the company to perform seven environmental projects valued at $9.1   The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In a concurrence in the order denying Alabama’s requested relief in Dunn v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:34 am
Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of a unanimous Supreme Court of the United States this week in the case of Chafin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:13 am
In its opinion, issued in July 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Mr. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Western District of Kentucky – November 13th, 2015 – This is a contract case involving imported gift products into the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
DC) where the the appointment of Margaret Peterlin to the position of Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office was alleged to be unlawful because she is not a "citizen of the United States who has a professional background and experience in patent or trademark law" as required under 35 U.S.C. [read post]