Search for: "Alabama v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 1,689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2019, 12:40 pm by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Middle District of Alabama – March 13th, 2019) involves a data-security breach. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am by davidferriero
District Court in the District of Columbia, and Archivist of the United States David S. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:17 am by Steven Cohen
Alabama State University – United States District Court – Middle District of Alabama – March 7th, 2019) involves a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which Gorsuch “sets forth a property rights-based argument for the protection of cell phone data under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered whether a period of pretrial imprisonment can toll a term of federal supervised release, comes from Fiona Doherty. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by David Kopel
The first post-Heller case to examine an age limit for the Second Amendment was the First Circuit's United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
United States, which set up a challenge to one of the exceptions to the double jeopardy clause. [read post]
United States, which set up a challenge to one of the exceptions to the double jeopardy clause. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a cert petition on the list for Friday’s conference, and to “hold that retired service members are no longer part of the ‘land and naval forces’ for purposes of the Constitution—and thus can be tried only by civilian, rather than military, courts for offenses committed after leaving active duty. [read post]