Search for: "Alan Rozenshtein"
Results 21 - 40
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2020, 6:50 pm
” Alan Z. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:13 pm
Alan Rozenshtein (University of Minnesota) to write a post about Mastodon and one particular recent controversy related to it, and he very kindly agreed. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 6:01 am
Still more from the free speech and social media platforms symposium in the first issue of our Journal of Free Speech Law; you can read the whole article (by Alan Rozenshtein, Minnesota) here, but here's the abstract: The technology giants that dominate Silicon Valley are facing unprecedented calls for regulation across a wide range of policy areas, ranging from content moderation and surveillance to competition, privacy, and consumer protection. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 11:27 am
January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution Alan Z. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Alan Rozenshtein (Minnesota; Google Scholar), Mandatory DEI Trainings and Academic Freedom: According to the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), a conservative advocacy group, the University of Wisconsin Law School conducted a mandatory 1L "reorientation DEI session" last week for which students had to fill out a "race timeline... [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Alan Z. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:59 am
January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution Alan Z. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota... [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 7:10 am
[Moderated by Kate Klonick, with Mary Anne Franks, Mike Godwin, James Grimmelmann, Gus Hurwitz, Jeff Kosseff, Emma Llanso, Alan Rozenshtein, Benjamin Wittes, Jonathan Zittrain, and me.] [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 2:01 am
For each paper, Alan Rozenshtein will be doing a podcast interview with the author, and the first guest is law professor Kyle Langvardt of the University of Nebraska College of Law. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
Legal Education: David Lat (Bloomberg Law), Pro Bono Supreme Court Amicus Briefs Provide Additional Evidence That BigLaw Skews Liberal Alan Rozenshtein (Minnesota), Wisconsin Law School's Mandatory DEI Trainings And Academic Freedom Law.com, Should US Law Firms Offer 20% Less Pay for 20% Less Work? [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 10:32 am
” Anna Bower, Alan Z. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 7:17 am
Alan Rozenshtein and Jed Shugerman have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Constitutional Commentary). [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 2:01 am
Julian Ku, Alan Rozenshtein, Benjamin Wittes, Natalie Orpett, Scott R. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:01 am
Anderson and Lawfare senior contributor Alan Rozenshtein. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:19 am
Anna Bower, Alan Rozenshtein, and Ben Wittes for Lawfare: The question of whether the Fulton County case should be removed to federal court—in whole or in part, temporarily pending resolution of certain immunity questions or all the way through… Continue reading The post “In Fulton County, Fear Not Removal” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:00 am
Tax Prof speakers include: Alice Abreu (Temple) Les Book (Villanova) Lilian Faulhaber (Georgetown) Richard Greenstein (Temple) Kristin Hickman (Minnesota) Stephanie McMahon (Cincinnati) Alan Rozenshtein (Minnesota) Caleb Smith (Minnesota) Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis) For a complete list... [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:01 am
Benjamin Wittes sat down with Lawfare executive editor Susan Hennessey, managing editor Quinta Jurecic, senior editor Scott Anderson, and Lawfare contributor and law professor Alan Rozenshtein to talk about the worst stories of the year, as well as their expectations and predictions for the coming year. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:01 am
Alan Rozenshtein spoke about Section 3 with professors Daniel Hemel of the University of Chicago Law School and Gerard Magliocca of the Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Alan Rozenshtein in The Atlantic: “Some have criticized the indictment for taking a position on the predicate to all of Trump’s actions—whether the 2020 election was stolen—and concluding that Trump in fact lost, fair and square. [read post]
