Search for: "Alaska v. Alaska Democratic Party" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2018, 1:32 pm by Amy Howe
She has “never considered” the president’s identity or party when evaluating Supreme Court nominees, she noted, and has supported nominees advanced by both Republican and Democratic presidents. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:04 am by Jon Hyman
Also on Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  The general statement of strict liability in Alaska is that “a manufacturer is strictly liable . [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Nearly 60 percent of the 110 people who have moved to the Hill from the influence industry since the midterm election went to work for House Democrats, a likely result of the flurry of new jobs available after the party regained control of the chamber. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
During that time, he would argue another nineteen cases before the Court, including a defense of Alaska’s sex offender registration law against a challenge in Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
As a consequence, the appointment of Stevens’ successor by a Democratic President with a Democratic Senate is unlikely to shift the Court’s rulings on most important social issues, such as abortion, affirmative action, religion, and gay rights.  [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
There's a legal doctrine out there called the "municipal cost recovery rule" that prevents governmental bodies from suing over response costs (medical bills, law enforcement, emergency services, that kind of thing) because it's an end run around the democratic process. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am by Jared Beck
 It seems practically self-evident to me that having its presidential nominee under indictment would be an utter travesty for the Democratic Party. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
The agreement, lodged in federal court in Boston, resolves federal and state liability claims against 49 potentially responsible parties for the cleanup of the site. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Apr. 29, 2009)(Unpub)Stepmom flips dismissal of her gender, retaliation/discharge claim, citing supervisor's statements of working mom animus> Noted here: Alaska Employment Law10th CircuitØ Turner v. [read post]