Search for: "Alexander v. Doe et al" Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am by Lisa Baird
Cynthia O’Donoghue et al. discussed this topic, and some options available to businesses , in a previous Reed Smith Client alert. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Sasha Volokh
Bond et al., Staff Report on Effects of Restrictions on Advertising and Commercial Practice in the Professions: The Case of Optometry 25 (FTC, Bur. of Econ., 1980). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
” [29] In essence, not only represented traditional committees would be subject to the disclosure rules, but also ad hoc committees. [30] V. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:45 am
Nev.) and SGF License, LLC v. steffigraf.com et al, Case No. 09-cv-00850 (D. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
However, that does not guarantee that a majority of the current Supreme Court will not discover grounds for distinguishing the president's obligations with respect to the judiciary from his obligations with respect to Congress or narrow or even overrule Nixon across the board.Meanwhile, don't expect Don McGahn (or Rudy Giuliani, Mick Mulvaney, John Bolton et al) to appear before Congress in the very near future. [read post]