Search for: "Alexander v. Sharpe" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
If he lives that long.)P.S. - For a sharp contrast to Alexander, take a look at Solomon, decided the same morning by the same court and with the same unanimous result. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 21 November the Court of Appeal delivered a major decision on the statutory public interest defence for defamation claims, in the case of Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  First, the old Court imposed sharp limits on federalism by a narrow reading of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
We’re grateful to learn of a legal historians' brief in Comcast Corporation, Petitioner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
Citing the 2001 decision in Alexander v Sandoval, Roberts also referred to “our new approach to statutory interpretation”. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on  Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am by legaleaseckut
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am by legaleaseckut
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
 There, the Supreme Court emphasized that debate on public issues `may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks’ on politicians. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Helen Klein
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The case provides some Supreme Court guidance on section 4, largely endorsing the decision in Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591, whilst adding some refinement on the legal analysis provided therein. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
“Businesses strive to operate more efficiently in a climate of sharp increases in operating expenses such as electricity and water. [read post]