Search for: "Alexander v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:51 am
Biden v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Texas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens made clear: Our new government is founded upon . . . its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
That small group includes George Washington’s chief of staff, a future United States president, and a controversial New York state politician. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 11:20 am
Alexander v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
The Editors Code of Practice, which is enforced by IPSO, states that corrections must be published “with due prominence. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:42 am
Brown, along with Biden v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:30 am
State governments have defended such taxes against First Amendment attack on the theory that (1) such taxes combat negative secondary effects and (under Renton v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol… [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court established in Alexander v. [read post]
