Search for: "Alexander v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 2,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
Well, in Alexander-David v LB Hammersmith & Fulham, those good intentions (and property law) have bitten back. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am by UKSC Blog
On Monday 20 July 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:55 am
The trial judge issued a short decision a few months after the verdict in which he stated that the damages award was reasonable. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:56 pm by Frank Heft
Plenary Resentencing Denied in First Step Act Case          In a published order on March 4, 2020, the Sixth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Yet, twenty years later, the Court issued its opinion in Nevada v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
In writing The Least Dangerous Branch, Alexander Bickel famously drew the title from Alexander Hamilton’s assurance, in Federalist 78, that “the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm by Jim Lindgren
It is true that Alexander Hamilton and one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase in Hylton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:41 pm
Unlike other states where showing a high level of control by the parent over the subsidiary is sufficient, Maryland is more restrictive; the corporate entity will only be disregarded when it is "necessary to prevent fraud or to enforce a paramount equity. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:50 am
This term, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Gould v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]