Search for: "Alford v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2017, 7:53 am
Texas is one of the states that will also allow an Alford plea. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:52 am
") AC35312 - State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:42 pm
In Greene v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
He entered an Alford plea on the drug charge, essentially acknowledging that the state had sufficient evidence of his guilt but not admitting to it. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
He entered an Alford plea on the drug charge, essentially acknowledging that the state had sufficient evidence of his guilt but not admitting to it. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:10 pm
Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm
So, let’s start with the…not so good: The Supreme Court of Mississippi in Alford v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm
In Alford v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:45 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
The trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his Alford plea and there was a factual basis for the plea State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
Alford, 994 S.W.2d 392, 395 (Tex. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Title: Alford v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
Alford v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:10 pm
— Hall v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am
Greene and Alford v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
As the reader may recall from other “Watch Your Language” articles for this Blog, because of this judicial deference to “commercial language”, you must say what you mean, precisely, or a judge will decide what you meant.Apparently, the plaintiffs in the recent Supreme Court of Ohio case, Alford v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
As the reader may recall from other “Watch Your Language” articles for this Blog, because of this judicial deference to “commercial language”, you must say what you mean, precisely, or a judge will decide what you meant.Apparently, the plaintiffs in the recent Supreme Court of Ohio case, Alford v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:06 am
STATE v. [read post]
