Search for: "Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2007, 1:05 pm
Federal Bureau of Prisons (06-9130) is now available here. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am
And he deplored as “wrong-headed” the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:40 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons (06-9130), and Friday in John R. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 9:01 pm
Federal Bureau of Prisons (06-9130), asking whether the United States waived sovereign immunity with respect to suits for losses of prison inmates' personal property. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:08 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:51 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 (available here). [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 3:38 pm
Federal Bureau of Prisons -- right to sue for loss of inmate's personal property Tue., Oct. 30 06-694 -- U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
But the Supremes did rule in Ali v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:03 am
The Court added review of a federal prisoner's rights case (Ali v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:35 am
Bureau of Prisons would file challenges to their convictions under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:39 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons] raises fascinating questions of statutory interpretation. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons (06-9130), rejecting the argument that the immunity law only applies to losses of property during customs or tax collection. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 552 U.S. 214 (2008), as “one or some indiscriminately of whatever kind” and concluded that “a counterclaim defendant is certainly a ‘kind’ of defendant and falls easily within ‘indiscriminately of whatever kind’ of defendant. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:06 pm
See Ali v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.The motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel isgranted. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
See, e.g., Ali v.Federal Bureau of Prisons, 552 U.S. 214, 219 (2008) (discussing cases and concluding “Congress’ use of “any” to modify “other law enforcement officer” is most naturally read to mean law enforcement officers of whatever kind”) (Thomas, J.); United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
IMPRINT Washington, D.C. : Bureau of National Affairs, c2001. [read post]
