Search for: "Ali v. Final Call, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2010, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  True, the ALI grinds slowly, but its final product is finer than anything you’ll find just about anywhere.One of the things that means is that a lot of the … umm, that’s quite a mouthful so we’ll just call it the “R3RUE” for short … was finished well before Bexis ever joined the ALI. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Finally, perhaps even more so than the MBCA, Delaware law evolves rapidly in response to changing conditions. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
As the latest draft states, "[w]e are now in the final stages of this project. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
We just got back - well, one of us, anyway - from the latest ALI Members' Consultative Group ("MCG") meeting concerning the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation (which we'll call "PLAL" for short). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  To rectify this situation, and deal with all the issues unanticipated in 1965, the ALI in 1997 adopted what amounts to a book in and of itself:  the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability.One place where the ALI was prescient in 1965 was in recognizing that some products had inherent risks that, no matter what, could not be designed away. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
He recently joined us on the faculty of the ALI-ABA eminent domain program in San Diego, and spoke at the 2011 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference in Beijing. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
The Lawsuit In the litigation, VIP Products LLC, a creator of adult beverage-inspired dog toys, sued Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc., America’s top whiskey seller, to assert their right to market and sell a dog toy called, “Bad Spaniels. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (Campbell precludes something called "aggregate disgorgement," which the court analogized to punitive damages); Engle v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the… [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004); McCombs v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:00 am by Kevin
Homeservices of Nebraska, Inc., 289 Neb. 927 (2015). [read post]