Search for: "Alling v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 46,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm
The United States filed an appeal, and -- as we all know -- eventually, the DADT policy was repealed.Which makes the case moot. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 18, like the parallel provision of almost all recent United States extradition treaties, stipulates that the Treaty is retroactive, in the sense that it applies to offenses committed before as well as after its entry into force, provided that the offenses were proscribed by the laws of both States when committed. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:30 pm
EXPLANATIONIt is unclear what factors explain the three-fold difference between the United States and Canada. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
On January 23, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 11:55 am
Here is the abstract: This paper examines the Reconstruction-era case of United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
United States. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:21 am
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
United States. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
(United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, March 2, 2020, Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 8:03 pm
Larson LR, Jennings V, Cloutier SA (2016) Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in American Center for Law & Justice v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
After all, Toy argued, the Hawaii law is in fact a statute applicable to members of the armed forces, at least the ones in Hawaii.CAAF was having none of it, and dispatched appellant's arguments for essentially the same reasons CCA dispatched the first argument. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Louisiana in the case of Barbour v. [read post]
