Search for: "Alling v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 52,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
12 May 2016, 8:03 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Larson LR, Jennings V, Cloutier SA (2016) Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
After all, Toy argued, the Hawaii law is in fact a statute applicable to members of the armed forces, at least the ones in Hawaii.CAAF was having none of it, and dispatched appellant's arguments for essentially the same reasons CCA dispatched the first argument. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in American Center for Law & Justice v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article VIII provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Jeff Redding
Windsor" I'm sure that I'm continuing to miss new pieces on United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
After trial, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Hurd, J.) entered a judgment of acquittal on the conspiracy count citing both factual and legal insufficiency as grounds for its decision. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 18, like the parallel provision of almost all recent United States extradition treaties, stipulates that the Treaty is retroactive in the sense that it applies to offenses committed before as well as after its entry into force, provided that the offenses were proscribed by the laws of both States when committed. [read post]