Search for: "Almendarez-Torres v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Rory Little
United States – which was a product of the residual clause itself — has generated. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:18 pm by Daniel Richman
United States and require that facts necessary for the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences (not just statutory maximums) be found by juries, it found no need to revisit another longstanding Apprendi wrinkle: the rule in Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Supreme Court rejected that argument in Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am by John Elwood
United States (10-6117) (both of which had been relisted three times), which presented the question whether Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:49 am by Rumpole
United States, 10-5296, and Vazquez v. [read post]