Search for: "Alred v. Commonwealth" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 4:07 pm by James McComish
” Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 9) [2011] FCA 832 at [40] Referring to remarks in Yamouchi v Kishimoto (2002) 12 NTLR 32 and Bell Group Ltd (In Liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation (2004) 208 ALR 491, his Honour considered that to take evidence by video link was, in effect, to exercise the judicial power of the Commonwealth of Australia in the foreign country in which the witness was sitting; and that even if the… [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
Related posts:Fraudulent alienation of foreign immovables and the Moçambique rule in the Western Australian Court of Appeal Singh v Singh (2009) 253 ALR 575; [2009] WASCA 53,... [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:44 pm by Perry Herzfeld
Singh v Singh (2009) 253 ALR 575; [2009] WASCA 53, in the Western Australian Court of Appeal, was a dispute between two brothers, both resident in Western Australia. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In the very recent case of Sarki v Sarki & Ors,[1] the Nigerian Court of Appeal considered the issue of what court had territorial jurisdiction in a matter of succession and administration of estate of a deceased person’s property under Nigerian conflict of laws dealing with inter-state matters. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
An award cannot, however, be executed, in the sense of executed against the property of an award debtor, without first being converted into a judgment of a court: Uganda Telecom Ltd v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 206; 277 ALR 441 at [12]-[13]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
An award cannot, however, be executed, in the sense of executed against the property of an award debtor, without first being converted into a judgment of a court: Uganda Telecom Ltd v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 206; 277 ALR 441 at [12]-[13]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
An award cannot, however, be executed, in the sense of executed against the property of an award debtor, without first being converted into a judgment of a court: Uganda Telecom Ltd v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 206; 277 ALR 441 at [12]-[13]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Australia, legislation for the protection of journalists’ sources will go before the Commonwealth parliament[3]. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The purpose of this write up is to briefly highlight the confusion on the concept of jurisdiction in Nigerian conflict of laws through the lens of a very recently reported case (reported last week) of Attorney General of Yobe State v Maska & Anor. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]