Search for: "Alston v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2021, 6:30 am by Kelly Schoening Holden
The memo goes on to explain that the societal landscape has changed leading up to and as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in NCAA v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am by Florian Mueller
Ericsson evidentiary hearing (a trial by any other name) in the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) (Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Monica Bhattacharyya.Here are the minutes of the final trial day in Texas, which was rather short owing to the settlement:Ericsson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am by Brett Holubeck
  What does Alston hold for the future of college sports and compensation? [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:20 am by Zachary Spilman
Bonner follows the same reasoning employed by the AFCCA’s recently published opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Alston, the Court rejected the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s argument that it should have benefited from a “quick look”, restating that “most restraints challenged under the Sherman Act” are subject to the rule of reason.[26] The message from the Court is clear: rules are the exception, not the norm. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
For the past few years, I have watched with some apprehension the explosion of legalized gambling in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 5:01 pm by The CGCP Team
Gechlik observes: Finding cybernorms that are acceptable to the United States and China, which have different ideologies and practices as well as enormous interests at stake, is challenging. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
On September 22, 2009, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas approved the settlement. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 5:25 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States, the justices are asked to consider the scope of the confrontation clause in the context of incentives given for accomplice testimony. [read post]