Search for: "Alvarado v. United States"
Results 61 - 68
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2015, 8:15 am
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Again, this opinion is valid only for the State of Massachusetts and not Utah. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:13 am
The test for severity in international law is an objective one (A v United Kingdom) and we ask whether the humiliation to the victim is so intense that a reasonable person would be outraged (Prosecutor v Aleksovski). [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:15 am
The case began on April 6, 2007 at 9:57 a.m., when Howard and Maureen Cotterman came to the Lukeville Port of Entry (POE) in Lukeville, Arizona seeking admission to the United States: In primary [inspection], a Treasury Enforcement Communication System (`TECS') hit was observed based on Mr. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
This guide is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as… [read post]
