Search for: "Alvarez v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2013, 10:53 am by Amy Howe
When Lauren Moskowitz, the attorney for Diana Montoya Alvarez, stood up this morning to argue on behalf of the respondent in the international family law dispute Lozano v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:04 am by Beth Graham
In her dissent, Judge Alvarez disagreed by stating: Icon knew about the arbitration clause before the contract was executed. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:31 am by Family Law
From Margaret Ryznar, writing for the Huffington Post: On December 11, 2013, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Lozano v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
United States (Alvarez Machain II), 266 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Alvarez v Popect Hosp. ruled that when the moving party has demonstrated entitlement to summary judgment, the burden of proof shifts to the opposing party which must demonstrate by admissible evidence the existence of a factual issue requiring trial. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Alvarez – federal judge’s power to suspend the one-year filing deadline under the Hague Convention for return of a child allegedly abducted by a parent No. 12-794 — White v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
Long Island Probate Lawyers said it was held in Alvarez v Prospect Hosp. and Phillips v Joseph Kantor & Co. that summary judgment may be granted only when it is clear that no triable issue of fact exists. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
One witness, V, stated decedent "was incoherent of everything and did not know what was going on around him." [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
As held in Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., the proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact. [read post]