Search for: "Alvarez v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2023, 8:22 pm
Francisco Andres ALVAREZ, Defendant and Appellant. 2023 WL 9014911 (Cal.App. 4 Dist.), 1 Summary: In Mitchell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:15 pm
Lyle Denniston has previewed the first case, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 3:09 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 3:01 pm
” State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:16 am
Disqualifying an individual who has intentionally made a false statement of any material fact in his or her application for public employment United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
Alvarez (N.D. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 9:36 am
The Supreme Court has dismissed as moot, Alvarez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:30 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present… [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 10:42 am
As a lawyer and former law clerk for the Cook County State's Attorney, I find State's Attorney Alvarez's position on this issue very credible. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:15 am
In Alvarez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously on Wednesday in Lozano v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
Rickman v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:30 pm
Rickman v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
Montoya Alvarez, stating that the one year "statute of limitation" within which the courts of a country to which a child has been abducted (or, in the language of the statute, "removed") must order a child "returned" to the original place of residence is not extended if the [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 3:21 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 12:23 pm
Alvarez-Machain. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 8:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
Alvarez: Trademark Dilution and the First AmendmentEarlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion on the Stolen Valor Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
