Search for: "Alyson Grine" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am by John Rubin
McCoy, 303 N.C. 1 (1981); see also John Rubin & Alyson Grine, North Carolina Defender Manual § 7.3C, When Right Attaches (Vol. 1 Pretrial, 2d ed. 2013). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Jeff Welty
Those interested in this issue may wish to review the discussion of race and consent in Alyson Grine and Emily Coward’s book, Raising Issues of Race in North Carolina Criminal Cases (School of Government 2014). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm by Jamie Markham
John Rubin & Alyson Grine, North Carolina Defender Manual, Vol. 1, Pretrial (2d ed. 2013), at 6-10 (discussing whether the gravamen of a contemporaneous conviction may be used as an aggravating factor for the sentencing of a joined offense). [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am by Emily Coward
The Supreme Court’s opinion After determining that the Georgia Supreme Court’s order involved a federal question that the Court had the authority to review, the Court turned to the three-step Batson test, described by Alyson Grine in a recent blog post. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am by Phil Dixon
Shea blogged about the new crimes of death by distribution and aggravated death by distribution in G.S. 14-18.4, here. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:41 am by John Rubin
In a recent blog post, my colleague Alyson Grine analyzed some of the evidentiary issues that may arise in felony breaking or entering prosecutions in these kinds of cases. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:41 am by John Rubin
In a recent blog post, my colleague Alyson Grine analyzed some of the evidentiary issues that may arise in felony breaking or entering prosecutions in these kinds of cases. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am by Emily Coward
The Supreme Court’s opinion After determining that the Georgia Supreme Court’s order involved a federal question that the Court had the authority to review, the Court turned to the three-step Batson test, described by Alyson Grine in a recent blog post. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Jeff Welty
This post addresses three recurrent issues concerning eyewitness identification: When, if at all, is expert testimony about eyewitness identification admissible? [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Jeff Welty
This post addresses three recurrent issues concerning eyewitness identification: When, if at all, is expert testimony about eyewitness identification admissible? [read post]