Search for: "Amanda Shanor"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am
You can reach her by e-mail at shanor@wharton.upenn.edu [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Bainbridge, Restoring Confidence in the Roman Catholic Church: Corporate Governance Analogies, (UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 18-32 (2018).Amanda Shanor, First Amendment Coverage, (93 New York University Law Review 318 (2018)).Steven Douglas Smith, 'Fixed Star' or Twin Star? [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm
And as professor and former ACLU staffer Amanda Shanor explains in a recent post, anti-BDS laws and antidiscrimination laws are nothing alike. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
” FLASHBACK FRIDAY In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Amanda Shanor, professor at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, argued that the Supreme Court took a step toward enabling discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in its decision in Fulton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
Amanda Shanor analyzes Monday’s decision in Barr v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Morgan Weiland “Thin Autonomy” and the Digital Speech CrisisPresenter: Amanda Shanor: New third tradition in free speech theory: autonomy justification—thin autonomy, stripping hallmarks of human autonomy in self-expression and self-creation, leaving only freedom from the state. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
In an analysis in SCOTUSblog, Amanda Shanor of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania predicts that the Court’s ruling could revolve around the grammar of a TCPA provision that suggests that regulated telephone number storage and production may include “using a random or sequential number generator”—the method used by robocallers. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 9:02 pm
– The Editorial Board of The Regulatory Review Top Contributor Essays of 2021 December 27, 2021 We are pleased to feature the top essays written by our outside contributors in 2021, including Jai Massari and Christian Catalini’s “Defi, Disintermediation, and the Regulatory Path Ahead,” Sarah Roubidoux Lawson and Megan Powell’s “Unsettled Consequences of the McGirt Decision,” Amanda Shanor’s “LGBTQ+ Need Not Apply,”… [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
Amanda Shanor had this blog’s preview. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 8:31 pm
As many scholars have documented – including Yochai Benkler, Jack Balkin, and Robert Post and Amanda Shanor – corporations have sought to undermine publicly interested regulations as a violation of corporate First Amendment rights. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
Amanda Shanor analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Barr v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
” At The Nation, David Cole and Amanda Shanor argue that “[t]he First Amendment protects the right to speech, but not the right to get something for nothing. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:45 pm
” Two Yale law students, Amanda Shanor and Leah Belsky, took part in the argument, taking the podium briefly to make points about the scope of habeas rights. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
(Amanda Shanor (Take Care) and Robert Loeb (Lawfare) have posted analyses that are similar to the Knight Institute’s, though more detailed and worth reading.) [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 9:05 pm
LGBTQ+ Need Not Apply June 21, 2021 | Amanda Shanor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania In a ruling last week, the U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2023 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
