Search for: "Amazon.com v. Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2017, 7:30 am by Paul Caron
Seattle Times, Amazon Wins $1.5 Billion Tax Battle With IRS: Amazon.com scored a big victory Thursday against the IRS in a case that the company says could have cost it about $1.5 billion [Amazon.com v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:39 am by Mark Summerfield
The Attorney General of Canada and The Commissioner of Patents v Amazon.com [2011] FCA 328 (24 November 2011) The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal has issued its decision in the dispute between Amazon.com and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) over whether Amazon’s ‘1-click’ ordering system comprises patent-eligible subject matter in Canada. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Fenwick & West Blogs
The Canadian case, Amazon.com, Inc. v The Attorney General of Canada and The Commissioner of Patents (October 14, 2010) refers to the Bilski decision and determines that Amazon's one-click purchasing method is patentable subject matter in Canada. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:59 am by David Canton
For the London Free Press – November 22, 2010 Read this on Canoe Traditionally, they have been reserved for inventions that are tangible The recent Federal Court of Canada decision in Amazon.com Inc v. the Attorney General of Canada held that a “business method” can be patented in Canada. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:13 am by war
Telstra Corporation Limited v Amazon.com, Inc. [2011] APO 28 The specification in AU 762715 (pdf) [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:39 am by Berin Szoka
State Sales Taxes, Too Late for Carnaval Communications Daily: Hugo Chavez Rumored Replacement for Retiring FCC Commissioner, Promises Not to Regulate Internet Washington Post: Obama Makes Good on Campaign Transparency Promises, Installs 24/7 Webcams Throughout White House New York Times: New Study: Kids Under 13 Suddenly Start Lying about Age to Evade COPPA Parental Consent Requirement Gawker: State of the Net Conference Again Frustrated by Insufficient Bandwidth, Organizers Promise More… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
As far back as 2012, the FTC advocated reasonable collection limitation. 2 Now, according to the FTC, using an interface to steer consumers to an option to provide more information than the context makes necessary may be considered a dark pattern, in violation of Section 5. 3 Focusing more narrowly on AI and machine learning in a recent case, all three sitting commissioners stated that “machine learning is no excuse to break the law. [read post]