Search for: "Ambassador, Inc. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
The case is McLaren v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am by Vanessa Sauter
Yishai Schwartz provided an update on military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
But I am aware of only one case that suggests that TRIPS might be relevant for interpreting U.S. substantive law: in Rotec Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am by Florian Mueller
Sept. 12, 2007) (granting stay requested by wireless carriers and handset manufacturers);Dynatec Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Woodrow Pollack
The Appointments Clause provides that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States." [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:31 am by Larry Tolchinsky
VENETIAN PARK CONDO III ASSN INC VENETIAN PARK CONDO IV ASSN INC VENETIAN PARK CONDO V ASSN INC WOODLAKE APTS. [read post]